'Inteligence' Hate to burst your bubble but as somebody who has studied education, america has one of the lowest educations in the developed world, obviously excluding the elite. We are now referred to as a democracy which is far from what the founders had in mind, as a matter of fact they said democracy is one of the most dangerous forms of government, where the majority rules with no regard for individual or minority rights. Could I be wrong? That is exactly what they want. They have never been audited. Ruled by = oligarchy. Anarcho-Capitalists would have no problem with Libertarian Socialists in their society so long as the initiation of violence is not used. You are allowed to think it is better, heck, you are even allowed to think the American people are better than others. Thank you for sharing :). Erm no thats called a good healthy life style, completely irrevelant to the point made. What we see today in America are neoCON Liberals which are Democrats mascarading as Conservatives. There'd be tokens for everything. It would be easier to read Wikipedia than have me explain its fundamental concepts. Well, that is until something happens to you where your government cant do anything about it... Then who do you cry to? And so am I.'' These people don't come to power by chance. 21 Those who cleanse themselves from the latter will be instruments for special purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work. Why would you choose to do something that is inferior by your own choice? It advocates responsibility and integrity. Libsoc is not centralised state socialism. Why not give them everything they need? As always, it was planned long before it became public.David Icke; The Biggest Secret. This will prolong the end of our freedom by several decades if done on a consistent basis, however eventually the small government leader will be replaced by a large government leader such as we have now. In other words, they will labor for the preparation for their own suicide.Vladimir Lenin; as quoted by Antony Sutton in Revolution, U.S., British, and German wolves soon found a bonanza of profit in selling to the new Soviet regime. Yes, there is a market where anyone can provide goods and services to individuals and/or other entities for the sake of making money. 1929 - The Great Depression begins, plunging the world into an unprecedented economic slowdown. Socialism gains its true form only through a total fighting brotherhood with the forward-striving energies of a newly awakened nationalism. Capitalism is when a guy buys a patent for a drug and is allowed to raise the market price from $2 to $750 because it is his "right". John Coleman; The Committee of 300, The Capitalists of the world and their governments, in pursuit of conquest of the Soviet market, will close their eyes to the indicated higher reality and thus will turn into deaf mute blind men. The U.S. is widely considered the bastion of capitalism, and large parts of Scandinavia and Western Europe are considered socialist democracies. Pure Capitalism isn't possible because there is no set definitions of terms and, most important, concentration of assets soon warps Capitalism into kleptocism or some other form of plutocratic system. Defining Capitalism vs Communism in Free Market Society Lcrw will change management and serious infection. Difficulty of Living in Society -> This category honestly baffles me. I accepted this comparison until I got to the point that Jesus as a God of democracy. And in reality, Nazis (Fascists) are capitalists, spawning many billionaires from their wars. After the breakup of Standard Oil, Rockefeller's wealth rises until he becomes the world's first billionaire. It's just an insane hamster wheel of debt, hopelessness, and alienation. Maybe if you are in grade 6 and drawing this out on a scrap piece of paper using a pencil and describing why people vote. 1947 - China is taken over by a communist regime led by Mao Zedong. We live in a resource intensive world. Yes, people moved to America. But in so doing they have also become corrupted and lost many of the virtues children possess. Choose not to. halleriously stupid chart, recommend you look up definitions of words in your chart as its completely wrong, don't blame you though, iknow USA education is dreadful, arrogant retards. :) :). Except of all this, capitalism didn't work, doesn't work, will never work. If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all. No restriction on who may own capital. Libsoc, unlike Ancap, restricts the individual to only positive liberties. How “socialist” was National Socialism? Capitalism is better for poor people than any other form of government that we have ever seen. BANKRUPTCY!!! Surely that should make "intelligence required" low for that category too. Because societal ills must be the fault of someone or something, and corporations are far enough beyond the understanding of the worker sheep that keep the left-wing in power, regular complaints about the "Evil Corporations" are sufficient to keep ignorant voters in line. libritarianism is like a smaller version of socialism. Laissez-faire means to "let it be"; opposed to government intervention in economics because capitalists believe it introduces inefficiencies. It's actually probably the largest point and worthy of much philosophical consideration. The more they spend, the more inflation is created and the poorer the people get because of that. "Production for profit": useful goods and services are a byproduct of pursuing profit. Free market = what's that? Democrats increase the size of government, into that larger category above. If I can't fish and someone teaches me to help? Of course it looks like that on the surface level. More specifically, it is the view that revolution is a necessary precondition for a transition from the capitalist mode of production to the socialist mode of production. Objectivist philosopher Ayn Rand stated that the right to private property is the fundamental right, for if one cannot own the fruits of one's labors, then the person is always subject to the state. "How can a system which mandates the continual poverty and oppression of the masses, and which requires them to surrender the majority of the fruits of their labour, through no fault of theirs, be the best system for them?". View source . As I said, you’re clearly intelligent. I love how people complain about bias in the chart and then blame everything on the "evil" corporations. I hope it is beginning to become clear what is going on here. Socialism works well for ensuring everyone benefits and shares the fruits of their labor. All types of governments have greedy people with self-interest -- socialism, fascism, capitalism, it doesn't matter. If you want to help other people in capitalism you can. Capitalism or socialism/communism are socio-economic systems. You have some good ideas, but regardless of intention, to classify one human as superior over another is a fascist principle. Just because capitalism allows self interest doesn't mean it's bad. Collectivists are always interested in an easier lifestyle without doing any of the work themselves, that is why they support it. As it is not perfect we can assume the context of a persons social and economic standing is hugely important in shaping overall outcome. ''Economically capitalism is the best. The POTUS is also embroiled in several scandals that's affecting the nation and nobody does anything about it. Education should be a state run process to adress the collective will and need of the nations economy,values and desires. I have the potential to be, we all do. We all have our own way of saying things that is your own personal privileges. Once again your deluding yourself, healthcare in america is ran by private companys inthe private sector. Therefore, 51% will always take away the rights of 49%, which results in a loss of liberty for all. Mussolini described his new movement as a "Third Way" between capitalism and communism. Level of freedom = tapped. He openly acknowledged that the Nazi party was "socialist" and that its enemies were the "bourgeoisie" and the "plutocrats" (the rich). Bailouts are : UN-CAPITALISTIC!!! This is what C/S/F are all working towards bringing in.'' UK has some of the leading business entrepreneurs. My cheesy one-liner for such a game would be "there ain't no war, but class war". You can choose to support something or not to support something. We're pigs. i should tell him wut an idiot he is! It's natural for people to push their ideals on others. We have not seen free market Capitalism in 100 yrs.We have gotten a taste of it,but Michael here, who can’t tell the difference between your and you’re has no reference point.We have been under a Communist - Fascist government for DECADES ! Web. A capitalism is ruled by numerous parties. I mean this has to be a joke. If this were the case children wouldn't need parents. The real conflict is not so much “America vs. China,” but finance capitalism vs. industrial “state” capitalism/socialism. As far as the statement you need money to get rich, not true. Here I am trying to keep freedom, liberty and God in the world and here you are trying to take it away. There's laissez-faire capitalism, the closet to free trade. Our country was meant to be a representative Republic with our constitution installed as a safeguard for our rights. We are for the National Socialist German Workers Party! All this is is bullying other people, possibly with force, into your view in the name of equality. I'd love to hear how the author determined that western Europeans are relatively ignorant and have arrested personal growth compared to the superior, "well-educated" and "decent" Americans with fantastic "personal growth.". To say that free agreement is all that is necessary to ensure equality, and hence liberty, is to ignore all those externalities that are thrust upon a man: flood, famine, pestilence, birthright and social privilege to name but a few. Capitalism promotes a "society of contract" as opposed to a "society of status." Like the information technology bubble in 1999, the housing bubble in 2007, and the Wall Street bubble in 2008, the fourth bubble that is government threatens our economy. I have felt for quite a while now that we are no longer a republic, but we are a fascist state now. The citizen then loans power to the state. Reasons why people go to the USA is cause of war and a safe opportunity well the list goes on...and on. You can't compare it to a capitalist society since there aren't any. 10 Most Beautiful Fonts For Big, Bold, And Beautiful Headlines They cant be compared. Reading books isn't as cool as sex or sports. But now, everything is so Globalized. Capitalism in it's current state isn't working, because it is elitist, capitalism doesn't need to go, it needs to be fixed. What would a Libertarian Socialist society do with Anarcho-Capitalists? Where as Stalinism would tell them to suck it up, and use the tokens they have. It's illogical, irrational and immoral. So if anything needs fixing it is that. Greedy bankers and business men saw the Articles of Confederation as an impediment to trade. If you get sick the ER has to take you in. This is assuming the 10 ever claimed usage over all the land, instead possibly holding large tracts in non-ownership for hunting and forestry etc. It's insanity! So? What we really need is libertarian socialism, the marrying of both political and economic liberty. They would have to fall back on some form of Gestapo, no doubt very humanely directed in the first instance. Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the object worship of the state. Both systems tend to operate best under democratic governmental systems (when used under more autocratic or authoritarian systems they tend to devolve). If nothing suits your liking you can do it yourself. The central arguments in the socialism vs. capitalism debate are about economic equality and the role of government. When linked to imperialism, as in the works of Vladimir Lenin, capitalism is also seen as a destroyer of cultural differences, spreading a message of "sameness" across the globe that undermines or drowns out local traditions and mores. Western Europe had hundreds of near constant warfare under capitalism. And then once they multiply to 1,000 people on that island, how would land now be divided and used? Your statement about opportunity pertains to equality of outcome, not opportunity. NOTE TO ANYONE READING THE ABOVE IT IS ALMOST ENTIRELY INACCURATE, DON'T BE MISINFORMED BY PEOPLE WITH AGENDAS RESEARCH THE SUBJECTS YOURSELF. If it wasn't for copyright shit, I'd publish this as a D&D manual. No one feels like they have anything. We shouldn't have too. The guy runs with the ball. Your thoughts on these two (Difficulty of Living in Society Level of Intelligence Required) are humorous and wrong. Nobody looks at the Constitution anymore, and only a few of us pay any attention to The Creator of the universe anymore. Totally ludicrous if you ask me. Why do you have to interfere with the property of others? I can do it too. Goods and services are produced to make a profit, and this profit is reinvested into the economy to fuel economic growth. If I came across as saying that Europeans are ignorant compared to Americans then I have been misunderstood -- all people of all nations are equally ignorant. Borders extremism. lol Hence all the complicated arguments you all bigots says is your own word of mouth to swallow. The way they handled it was very fair and balanced. Without corporations and industrial socialisms (of left and right) and trust laws and restrictions on monopolies we end up in territory that Paul-Mason describes as post-capitalism, because capital is of very little use when it spreads out so thinly. It's like me asking you whether you would like to die by lethal injection or by having your head cut off. Government employee unions are the new elite, and we need a replacement model. Being in the right market with your product at the right time works great, especially when what you are selling is in demand. Socialists tend to agree with. Is it really better to give somebody a fish or to teach them to fish? There is close to nothing accurate about this chart.Your comment took the words right out of my mouth. They have wised up to the way things work down here and developed their intelligence. French economist Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century, which analyzes economic inequality under capitalism, becomes an international bestseller. -while economic systems are often strongly tied to government (and even enabled through them), strictly speaking they are not forms of government. Lansing v. Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9, (NY), At the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people and they are truly the sovereigns of the country. This is very clearly proven throughout history. Reminds of me reading about the great depression, when america had to throw milions of milk down the drain when people were malnurished. 2 POINTS! I belive you call this being a slave to industry. 1776 - Adam Smith publishes The Wealth of Nations, establishing an economic point of view on history, sustainability, and progress. I suggest you all educate yourselves with people like Milton Friedman. The land of EQUAL opportunity has turned into a place where special interest groups create the legislation that runs this country and special rights are handed out like candy. & T. Co. v. Debolt 16 How. I think Capitalism still exists in limited ways, and people like me are all for it. This is the same as the socialist conservatives. It is dependent on enforcement of property rights in all their forms - in trusts, in collective ownerships. That seems to be the dynamics behind this planet. Where profit seeking is advanced, society becomes run as an adjunct to the economy, and to the vanity of those in power. They're saying, "The column is not as you made it out to be and has changed as follows". Pure capitalism wouldn't have the government involved in businesses that can be done better in the private sector. Its been more of a Facist/Socialist economy where the government has bailed the big boys and screwed the middle class and poor by making the cost of living higher with their inflation. This is in contrast to the lack of opportunity inherent for the many in capitalism. As to capitalism not being fundamentally monopolistic you are right. Most people seem to think each one is distinct and that some are better than others. Are you crazy? Now, in all honesty i would agree with that statement, but you really should work to make it unbiased, if you want to build credibility. democrats are mainly libretarians, which want bigger government and more government controlled things. Laissez faire capitalism, as espoused in 19th century U.S. business growth, did reach the point where monopolies and oligopolies were formed (e.g., Standard Oil), which gave rise to antitrust laws, trade union movements, and legislation to protect workers. For capitalists, finding employees in an anarchist society would be next to impossible, especially in light of the resistance to all those heavy handed deprivations needed to force free men into the estates and factories historically. (sounds rather like the US?). If we were to steal money from somebody on the streets it is called crime. The current system we have right now is called Socialism. As someone who wants to run an rpg making points between the different ideologies, and how they'd react to it to see how they TRULY feel the best political policy is... this is good at exposing the subtle differences, but how ultimately they all collapse and change into one form or another. It's not like everything thats different is wrong. It's a hard sell to see the U.S. as a facist society right now. If there's too much trading going on between two candidates and it is seen as a conspiracy, they will both be punished. 1998 - Hugo Chávez is elected President of Venezuela and embarks on a nationalization program, leading a social democratic movement in Latin America led by Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, and others. The theory of socialism is a very pretty thing; but does it work? Who's to say it is worse to be born "less fortunate"? Freedom of religion, but usually promotes secularism. As I said, Socialism, Communism and Fascism are almost the exact same -- they are all collectivists that champion security over freedom. The only changes that we made is from our wrong selves because some would think that when we are born to this reality and when we our souls are returned back into our spiritual form do we need to look good by playing dressing up to our finest clothes. This is opposed to capitalism which is authoritarian, centralised within the organisation, and top-down. So? COMMUNISM HAS IT'S PROBLEMS, BUT THE USSR HAD ONE OF THE MOST EDUCATED POPULATIONS THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN, THE US BY COMPARISON HAS ONLY 22% WITH EVEN BACH DEGREES COMPARED TO THE USSR WHERE THE AVERAGE CITIZEN HAD A BACH MORE LIKELY A PHD. I am sure america hold people in alcatraz without trial for 7 years in the need of 'security' As are numerous terrorism laws introduced in your sopposed free goverment, such hypocracy here it is untrue. So if you're mad about the American school system that is a socialist model. When the continent and countries were under colonial rule, yes, many of the resources went out to the mother country. It is actually a minority of people who emigrated to the US. Either way you're dead. The real power, you mean like the president being a poster boy for the real congress and corporations who fund their presidential election. Does this make them equal with children? How would he ever pay off his debt? On the surface it may appear this way but by actions it's not true. Fascism, Communism/ Marxism, Socialism, were literally the largest forms of government with the most control over people in the history of the world. Nothing makes sense. There's a big difference between National Socialism (NAZI Party) vs. Socialism. It wastefully diverts resources away from producing that which would raise consumers' standard of living (i.e., that which is demanded by consumers), toward destruction. Now we're hitting with something a bit closer to home :) You see, the boobs represent America and England. 1944 - The Canadian province of Saskatchewan forms the first socialist government in North America. Thank you for sharing :). The means of production are owned by public enterprises or cooperatives, and individuals are compensated based on the principle of individual contribution. Possibly, he obviously is at basketball. And you're not going to have a group of intellectuals outsmart the market when it comes to resource allocation. This is just pathetic, i didn't take the time to read the comments but let me say this Communism and Fascism and Socialism ARE NOT THE SAME THING and CAPATALISM is not a form of government its an economic principle that you seem to associate with democracy. This can be clearly evidenced in social mobility. Thems the facts kiddos. You can't choose not to buy from the government. ", —British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1945, Difference between socialism and communism. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and regaining German freedom. Every race and culture is unique in its own way and if you've been looking at our culture lately it's not doing so great mate we have a lot of obese people and if were lucky there's barely any morals to behold in this country. Stick with entrepreneurship and what you’ve learned in that arena. That is exactly what they want. Wait, what? Oh wait. So their alternative was to go to the US not cause it was a superior culture but because they had to survive. The president can then choose certain other officials, such as Supreme Court justices, however the legislative branch must confirm whomsoever he nominates to that position. 1. The subtle differences between them are minor things that make hardly any difference. Perrsonal decisions throughout your life and your character is what determines if somebody is morally superior such as George Washington vs Hitler. All of the things you complain about are made better from capitalism. The key arguments in the socialism vs. capitalism debate focus on socio-economic equality and the extent to which the government controls wealth and production. If I'd draw the left-wing, centre, right wing spectrum and compare it between Europe and USA I'd draw it like this: Europe: Extreme Left----------------------------C----------------------------Extreme Right How is renting to others wrong or bad? Just fyi a communism is ruled by a singe elite party. You can do whatever you want. Security over freedom is completely a personal issue of what ever goverment and is not attached to any of these policies. This obviously has a lot of spiritual considerations tied to it as well, but most collectivists want nothing to do with spirituality. There are problems with it though. I don't think so. So if you're mad about these fascist companies controlling our lives you have socialism and big government to blame for that. This has been going on for a long time now. The only feasible means of preserving our liberty is to vote for candidates who favor smaller government and hope they follow through. ummmmmmmmmmmmm please explain how we are a fascism. But let's explore this more because socialists are so confused about this. People can't handle the freedom of which medicine to take. That doesn't make you "socialist". Fair to who? Lol, no shit. There are tons of variables. And places like China? Which one offered more value to the world? As such, in order to understand their main features, we need to identify the primary characteristics of capitalism and socialism – the two theories on which mixed economy and market socialism are based upon. only downside it can only last for so long and that it would eventually lead to corporations and other big businesses owning the government with their lobbyist (which are retired senators) and what not. In Das Kapital, one of the most famous critiques of capitalism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels claim that capitalism centers profits and wealth in the hands of the few who use the labor of others to gain wealth. e.g. Yes some people believed it was a land of opportunity. The rulers of C/S/F determine what people will believe. All it does is make the insurance companies richer and the people poorer. Totalitarianism, exists to varying degrees in Communism and Fascism. Control can be a good thing when it's conrolled by the right people. Only in the final month when the war was to be lost, could you even attempt to suggest it was fascist. Individual growth is stunted and usually reversed. Thomas Jefferson and George Washington would be socialists today, they predated the system. Although this article focuses on socialism rather than Marxism per se, there is an important distinction within Marxist thought that warrants mention here. Governments based on those theories always self destruct or get put down due to their moral atrocities, failing economy, or lack of innovation whether by internal, or external forces. So too are the constitutional laws of Libsoc, as men are indeed forced to surrender all negative rights and to adhere unquestioningly to the positive right of usufruct. All of these imply that a central government leader is to replace a belief in God (or a god(s)) and ultimately an appreciate of a common law and rights to personal property. But money is everything, right? We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state. In a couple of your views I've noticed you've been more open-minded instead of secular minded. Therefore, since most people did not actually go to America, then we may safely state that America must be inferior to other nations. There are probably plenty of socialists who would like to distance themselves from the Nazi association and disaster, but in truth the Nazis differed from the communists only because of disagreement about their idealolgy of indoctrination - the Nazis believed the German brand of Socialism was superior. capitalism is part a economic system socialism and communism are ideology and economic theory fascism is capitalism in the wrong hands. I am not saying capitalism worst or socialism the best, what i am trying to say is any of these -isms is working. The byline shows written in 2010 and capitalism going from the 1800's to the 1900's. I'm lean partially right on the spectrum, but this article is uneducatedly heavy right leaning. They demanded a central authority to strike trade agreements for them with foreign governments. Europe and the U.S. react to the takeover with concerns that Communism will sweep away democracy. IT BOUNCED! I am forming my own opinion based off the facts and not the facts based off the opinion that was chosen by my manipulators. At stake is whether “the state” will support financialization benefiting the rentier class or build up the industrial economy and overall prosperity.